Attraction
Posted by Chevalier on July 6, 2009
I ran across a rather interesting — because rare — comment by an escort in a post on ASPD:
I can think of five long time regulars of mine, that I have seen for years.
All are unattractive, two are obese, one is disabled, and all are socially awkward.
You see comments by clients occasionally about how the ladies must perceive us as unattractive. But it’s pretty rare coming from the ladies, unless they can do it anonymously. (I suspect the five regulars Heather spoke about are not ASPD members and therefore wouldn’t see it.)
But it’s probably true in the vast majority of cases. For one thing, you rarely see ladies publicly contradict such statements. That is, even the ladies who speak very positively about liking their clients tend to state it without any reference to why or else explain it based on the clients’ intelligence, personality, attitude, etc. rather than their physical appearance. For that matter, Heather did the same later on in that same post:
Although they are lacking in the looks department, each of these men have hearts of gold, and are intelligent and fascinating in their own way.
Some clients assume the ladies see us only as ATMs. Even the more positive clients probably assume most ladies are thinking: “You’re not the kind of guy I normally find physically attractive, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t sincerely enjoy our time together. Looks aren’t everything.”
Despite what may appear at times to be an obsession by clients on what the ladies think of us in that respect, though, I suspect it’s usually not that big a deal for most, particularly given the typical age differences between escort and client. She wouldn’t fall in lust at first sight, across a crowded room? That’s fine. Attraction to our physical appearance isn’t critical . . . at least as long as she isn’t repulsed. I don’t mind that I’m not Brad Pitt, as long as she doesn’t mistake me for Quasimodo.
Of course, even if the ladies do see us just as ATMs, consider the context. Their decision to see us may in fact be based almost exclusively, other than safety/screening, on our willingness to pay their quoted rate. But how do we select them? Even though they might wish that we were more impressed by their intelligence or personality than their beauty (while still wanting us to also think they’re beautiful
), in fact, clients normally select almost exclusively based on the lady’s physical appearance and/or reported sexuality. In some respects this resembles a smaller version of the stereotype of the “trophy wife” phenomenon, doesn’t it? She is with him because he’s got money, he’s with her because she’s beautiful and much younger. Who is more shallow?
With repeat visits (as also happens to some degree with trophy wives), the inner qualities may become a factor. The $$$ and the beauty/sexuality still may be most important, but they’re no longer the only factor.
And multiple visits still won’t turn me into George Clooney or Brad Pitt.
Alexa said
I don’t mind that I’m not Brad Pitt, as long as she doesn’t mistake me for Quasimodo.
I always enjoy reading your take on things, Chev.
Sarah said
I have a lot of regulars (sorry – don’t mean to boast, it just happens to be true). They come in all shapes and sizes. I love them all in my own way. If I didn’t they would not be regulars any more.
Having said that – I am not a fan of beautiful men. They seem to have no inner beauty is the problem
Chevalier said
Hi Alexa,
Thanks for stopping by. I enjoy your blog immensely too. It can be quite, um, stimulating.
Chevalier said
Hi Sarah,
Good to hear from you again!
Heather made a similar point in that post:
Of course, some unattractive people also grow up boring, shallow, and without any inner beauty.
FatManHobbyist said
I sound like one of her regulars. LOL
Never thought I would get to have sex with beautiful girls again until I found the hobby.
hobbyist said
“all are socially awkward”…. “socially awkward”… Interesting phrease. Wow, that’s me!
FatManHobbyist: “Never thought I would get to have sex with beautiful girls again until I found the hobby.”
Yeah, me too, welcome to the club – that was me as well when I found the hobby in 1990, before that I had thought my days of enjoyable eroticism were over (Well, not that they had ever really STARTED.) At least I got in a couple more years of enjoyment, years I’ll always be able to look back on and enjoy in passing.
Free advice FMH… Don’t ever quit.
Chevalier said
As for me, without the hobby, I wouldn’t have had sex at all the past 15 or 20 years.
hobbyist said
Chevalier: “As for me, without the hobby, I wouldn’t have had sex at all the past 15 or 20 years.”
This is a fundamental disagreement /differing point of view that I have had for a long time with the ‘this should be all just for fun and games’ types on ASPD and elsewhere.
SURE, there ARE guys who are handsome, charming, have TONS of money, etc. and for THGEN p4p may well be just a ‘playtoy’. I can see where uys like that might have the viewpoint that p4p should be just a luxury or passing fancy that one should be able to leave behind and discard at the drop of a hat and never look back… They believe in addition that there is ‘obviously something wrong’ with guys who don’t agree with their viewpoint.
But IMHO there are many, MANY more guys like you, I and FMH Chevalier, probably actually a majority, guys who most likely WOULDN’T have a sex life at all, or certainly not a very enjoyable one, without the existance of p4p. Yeah, guys like us aren’t going to want to give it up easily. Does that make us “psycho” or crazy?
IMO… NO… we just have different movivatations and different outlooks due to our situation and circumstances.
Chevalier said
I’m not sure what I would do without P4P. I love my wife and wouldn’t want to divorce her. So, what would it be? Abstinence? Masturbation only? One-night stands or affairs? The last option, in terms of the time required and the potential emotional dangers, seems like a very bad choice, but the first two aren’t ideal either.